第二届“华政杯”全国法律英语翻译大赛初赛试题+答案（共5则范文）.docx

第二届“华政杯”全国法律英语翻译大赛初赛试题+答案（共5则范文）

第一篇：第二届“华政杯”全国法律英语翻译大赛初赛试题+答案（共）第二届“华政杯”全国法律英语翻译大赛初赛试题试题一：（合同法与侵权法）Contractsalsogenerategeneraldutiesofcareindealingwiththerights,objectsoflegalprotectionandlegallyprotectedinterestsofthecontractualpartners.Such“collateral”obligationsdonotnormallyhaveanyrelationtothecontentoftherespective“primary”performanceobligationandcanthereforeinprinciplebecomesignificantineverytypeofcontract.Themoreambitiousalegalsystemisinthedevelopmentofsuchcontractualcollateralobligationsfortheprotectionofinterestsalreadyexistingindependentfromthedirectperformanceexpectationsformedbythecontract,themorepracticalweightisgiventotherespectiveconcurrenceofactionsrules,whichgivedetailsoftherelationshipofcontractualliabilitywithparalleltortuousliability.合同在规定缔约伙伴的权利、法律保护的客体及受法律保护的利益时，也产生一般的注意义务。此种“附随”义务通常与各方的“主要”履约义务的内容无关，因此，基本上在各类合同中都变得很重要。在此类附随义务的发展过程中，一项法律制度越是注重以此来保护独立于合同确立的直接履约期待权而存在的权益，就越会重视行为竞合的规则，该规则会对合同责任与相应侵权责任之间关系作出详细的规定。Thenarrowerthescopeofcontractualdutiesis,thenarrowertheoverlapswiththeareaofapplicationoftortlawturnouttobe.Theconsequenceisinturn,thattheareaofapplicationoftherespectivelegalprinciplesgoverningconcurrenceofactionsbecomesnarrower.Aconcurrenceofactionsrulewhichgrantsinprinciplecontractualliabilitypriorityofapplicationovertortuousliability,hastokeeptheareaofcontractualliabilitynarrowintheinterestofprotectingthevictim,iftortlawismorefavorabletoaninjuredpartyinaninpidualcasethancontractlaw.合同义务的范围越窄，它与侵权法竞合的地方就越窄。规范行为竞合的法律原则的适用范围也就会变得越窄。如果在某一个案中适用侵权法可能比合同法更有利于受损害方，那么，原则上规定合同责任优先于侵权责任适用的行为竞合规则，须从保护受害人的利益角度出发，使合同责任的适用固定在有限的范围内。试题二：（财产法）SubjecttotheprovisionsoftheDeclarationandotherprovisionsoflaw,aunitowner:(1)maymakeanyimprovementsoralterationstohisunitthatdonotimpairthestructuralintegrityormechanicalsystemsorlessenthesupportofanyportionofthecommoninterestcommunity;(2)maynotchangetheappearanceofthecommonelements,ortheexteriorappearanceofaunitoranyotherportionofthecommoninterestcommunity,withoutpermissionoftheUnitOwnersAssociation(hereinafterc