2009年清华大学考博英语作文真题及.docx

2009年清华大学考博英语作文真题及

第一篇：2009年清华大学考博英语作文真题及2009年清华大学考博英语作文题目及范文关键词：考博英语写作题目：近些年学术界出现了，学者们盲目追求发表文章的数量，而忽视文章质量的现象，请以“quantityandqualityofworks”为题目阐明个人观点，书写工整、字数不少于300字。考博.中国参考范文：Thepastyearswitnessedconsiderableimprovementinscientificresearchinthiscountry.OnetypicalsignisthemountingnumberofpaperspublishedinSCIandSSCIperiodicals.However,thequalityofmanysuchpapersandworksisdoubtable.Oneproofisthattheaveragecitationfrequencyofthesepapershasremainedunchangedforyears.Thisphenomenonhasgivenrisetoheateddebate.Personally,Ibelievethatthisphenomenonshouldbeviewedfrommorethanoneperspective.Ontheonehand,itmustbeadmittedthattherehasappearedanundesirabletrendinChineseacademiccircleinthepastyears,thatis,toomuchemphasishasbeenputonthenumberofpaperspublishedratherthanthequalityofthesepapers,orsubstantialeffortsandcontributioninscientificresearch.Takingalookaround,onecanfindexamplestoomanytoenumerate.Thenumberofpapers,especiallythenumberofpaperspublishedinSCIorSSCIperiodicalshasbeenregardedasthemostimportantorthesinglecriteriainuatingascientificresearcher.Itisevendirectlyrelatedtohissalaryandopportunityforpromotion.ThistrendhasledChineseacademytoanunhealthyroadofdevelopment.Aswecansee,manyscholarshavebecomemoreofwritersthanresearchers.Someevenplagiarizeinordertopublishmorepapers.Ontheotherhand,however,weshouldnothastilysaynotothequantitativeuationofscientificresearchers.Infact,thenumberofpapersisacriticalindexinmeasuringtheachievementofascholaroranacademicinstitution.Aswecansee,nationswithdevelopedsciencesrankamongthetopinSCIandSSCIpublications.QuantitativeuationisespeciallynecessaryinsomedisciplinesinChinawheretherearenotsufficientexpertstogiveanobjectiveassessment.Tosumup,weshouldnotgotoextremesinthismatter.Whileweshouldcontinuetoadoptthequantityofworksasanindexinuatingscientificresearchers,weshouldnotlayasmuchemphasisonitaswedid.Instead,morefreedomandalooserenvironmentshouldbeprovidedforresearcherssothattheycangivefullplaytotheirtalent.Onlyinthiswaycanweexpectaboomofscienceinthiscoun