英语辩论稿.docx

英语辩论稿

第一篇：英语辩论稿一辩陈词自由辩：二辩：纸质书比电子书更有利于身体健康.Thereisnodoubtabouttherapiddevelopmentofthee-book,butwedon’tthinkthatpaper-bookswillbereplacedbye-books.Nowadays,peoplearepayingmoreandmoreattentiontohealthissues.Itisimportanttorealizethate-booksareeasytocausedamageofoureyesandvisionloss;Andthereareotherhealthrisksusinge-books.Whenwereade-booksratherthanpaper-booksforalongtime,paper-booksaremorehealthiertothereaders.反方二辩：看纸质书看久了也会对视力不好Itisimportanttorealizethatpaper-booksarealsoeasytocausedamageofoureyesandvisionlosswhenwereadforalongtime.Forexample,Sushi(苏轼)isalsoamyopiaman.一辩：纸质书给作者的版权保护更完整，更能保证收入，而且纸质书拥有的是所有权而电子书只是使用权Anotherproblemisthecopyright.Despitethecurrentpaper-bookrampantpiracyproblem,itcanprotectthebenefitsoftheauthor’sbetterthane-books.E-booksraisesthepopularityofpiracy.Althoughpeoplemayneedtopayfortheirdownloadingsomee-books,butinmorecases,theuseronlyneedclickhismouse.Andthewriterusuallygetlesspaymentfortheirbooks.Thepressoftenchoosetopublishrealbooksandjustprovideapartofthebookontheinternet,thuswecanbesurethatpaper-booksgivethepressandtheirwritersmuchmorereturnthane-books.反方三辩：现在的盗版书猖獗，一样没有版权提问：电子书携带方便，传播方便，纸质书就做不到。Nowpiratedbooksisalsorampant,thereisnocopyrighttoo.E-bookscanbeeasytocarryforreadinganytime,e-booksisfarmoreconvenientthanpaper-books.二辩：纸质书也可以携带方便随时阅读，电子书没电了一样不能看提问：纸质书可以标注，便于阅读理解，电子书功能不够完善Paperbookscanalsoeasytocarryforreadinganytime,whenEbookisoutofelectricity,italsocannotread.Whenwearereadingarealbook,wecanlineaparagraphweareinterestedinconveniently,whichhelpsusalotinunderstandingandrememberingtheknowledgeweneed.Butwhenreadinge-books,wehavetobuildanewfileoruseanotebook,it’sveryinconvenientforus反方一辩：电子书一样可以标注，很多文档软件都有标注功能，更多样化提出：纸质书有环保问题E-bookscanbeannotatedveryconvenientalso,alotofdocumentsoftwarehavethisfunction,therearemorepersified.Paperbooksmaycauseenvironmentalproblems.三辩：纸质书可以回收利用，环保问题可以解决，电子书所用的电子产品的制造和处理也同样存在污染问题，不好解决Althoughpaper-bookshaveapollutionproblem,theelectricproductsthate-booksusemaycausemorepollutionproblemsthanpaper-makingp