您所在位置: 网站首页 / BCR Case Law.doc / 文档详情
BCR Case Law.doc 立即下载
2024-10-24
约1.2万字
约5页
0
48KB
举报 版权申诉
预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...

BCR Case Law.doc

BCRCaseLaw.doc

预览

在线预览结束,喜欢就下载吧,查找使用更方便

16 金币

下载文档

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

P257
1.Donoghuev.Stevenson[1932]AC562
(HL),decidedin1932,thathadsimilarfactsonlyinvolvinggingerbeerinsteadoflemonade.Whensummingup,thejudgeconcludedthat:Youmusttakereasonablecaretoavoidactsoromissionswhichyoureasonablyforeseewouldbeelikelytoinjureyourneighbour...personswharesocloselyanddirectlyaffectedbymyactthatIoughtreasonablyhavetheminmycontemplationasbeingsoaffectedwhenIamdirectingmymindtotheactsoromissionswhicharecalledintoquestion.Thiscasecreated"theneighbourprinciple",whichwouldbefollowedifLindasuedthemanufacturer,asthefactsofhercaseareverysimilar.
2BourhillvYoung[1943]A.C.92
Held:
thatthedutyofthemotorcyclistonthepublicroadtootherpersonsusingitwastodrivewithsuchreasonablecareaswouldavoidtheriskofinjury(includinginjurybyshockalthoughnodirectimpactoccurred)tosuchpersonsashecouldreasonablyforeseemightbeinjuredbyhisfailuretoexercisethatcare;
thattheappellantwasnotwithintheareaofpotentialdangerarisingastheresultofhisnegligence,and,accordingly,heowednodutytoherandwasnotguiltyofnegligenceinrelationtoher.

P258
3HaleyvLondonElectricityBoard[1964]2Q.B.121
HeldbytheAppellateCourt:HisactionclaimingfornegligencewasdismissedbyMarshallJ.,whoheldthatthedefendantshadnotbeenguiltyofnegligenceasfollow.
Thequestionhereiswhethertheseworksconstitutedadangertopedestriansonthehighway.Thequestioniswhetheritwasadangertothepublicatlargejudgedbythestandardsofthenormalman.Thedefendantsowednospecialdutytoablindman.Aclothes-horsetypeofguardgiveswarningtoasightedpersonandisallthatisrequired,althoughitwouldbenoprotectiontoablindperson.Thequestionofcontributorynegligencewouldonlyariseiftherehadbeennegligence.Herethedefendantswerenotnegligence.HeldbytheHouseofLord:Thepossibilityofablindpersonwalkingthroughthatpathwasverylikely,sothedefendantshouldhaveforeseeit.Thepreventionoftheinjurywouldhavebeencheaperthantheinjury.LordReidofHouseofLordssaid:“Oneisentitledtoexpectofablindpersonahighdegreeofskillandcarebecausenonebutthemostfoolhardywouldventureoutalonewithouthavingthatskillandexercisingthat
查看更多
单篇购买
VIP会员(1亿+VIP文档免费下)

扫码即表示接受《下载须知》

BCR Case Law

文档大小:48KB

限时特价:扫码查看

• 请登录后再进行扫码购买
• 使用微信/支付宝扫码注册及付费下载,详阅 用户协议 隐私政策
• 如已在其他页面进行付款,请刷新当前页面重试
• 付费购买成功后,此文档可永久免费下载
全场最划算
12个月
199.0
¥360.0
限时特惠
3个月
69.9
¥90.0
新人专享
1个月
19.9
¥30.0
24个月
398.0
¥720.0
6个月会员
139.9
¥180.0

6亿VIP文档任选,共次下载特权。

已优惠

微信/支付宝扫码完成支付,可开具发票

VIP尽享专属权益

VIP文档免费下载

赠送VIP文档免费下载次数

阅读免打扰

去除文档详情页间广告

专属身份标识

尊贵的VIP专属身份标识

高级客服

一对一高级客服服务

多端互通

电脑端/手机端权益通用