道德绑架的中英文对照议论文.docx

道德绑架的中英文对照议论文

第一篇：道德绑架的中英文对照议论文Moralabduction[æb'dʌkʃn]:isakindofbehaviorwhichusethemoralasanexcusetoforceinpidualsorgroupstodosomethingnominalgoodormeasureordinarypeoplewiththesaint'sstandardsbymakingmoralanobligation.Forexample,ifsomeonerefusestobeabravecitizenindangertime,thenhewillbecondemned;ifsomeoneissupposedtosupporttheHopeProjectbuthedidn’t,thenhewillbecondemned,bothofthesephenomenonsaremoralabduction,althoughtheyaskedforgoodaim,becausethisisnotanyone’sdutytobeself-sacrifice.“Moral”itselfdoesnothavepropertyof“obligation”,“moralobligation”isalogicalerrorandshouldnotexist.It’sunfairtobecriticizedforbeingstingyjustbecauseyouchangeyourwi-fipasswordtostopyourneighborsharingitwithoutyouragreement.,道德绑架：以道德为砝码，要挟个人或众人不得不做某些事情，用圣人的标准要求普通人，用美德来要求道德义务。比如，要求一个人舍身救人，否则就要谴责，这就是道德绑架；要求一个人掏钱支持希望工程，这尽管是一件好事，但如果一个人不掏就要谴责，这也是道德绑架，因为这并非他的义务。因为“道德”本身并不存在“义务”属性，“道德义务”一词犯了逻辑上的错误，本身不应存在。Perhapsyouhaveheardthisjoke:Therewasamanwhohadinsistedongiving10dollarstoabeggarperdayfortwoyears.Thenonedayhegavethebeggar5yuan.Thebeggaraskedhim,whysolittle?Hesaid,Iwassinglebefore,soIcangiveyouten,butnowIhavegotmarried,Ihavetosupportmywife.SoIcanonlygiveyoufiveyuan.Afterlisteningtotheman,thebeggarbecameveryangryandsaid:howcouldyoutakemymoneytosupportyourwife!大家或许听过照这个笑话：有个人每天给门外一个乞丐10元钱就这样坚持了两年。后来一天他给了乞丐5元。乞丐就问他，怎么这么少？他就说，之前我是单身，所以能给你十块，现在我有老婆了，我还要养活我老婆。就只能给你五块了，乞丐听了后大怒，给了那人一个耳光说：你怎么可以拿我的钱养你的老婆呢！Therealityisnotlessridiculous.Someinternetusershaddemonstratedspontaneouslyforcallingfordonationsfromalocallotterywinnertosavelives.ButinfactChina'sfirst“LotteryRegulations”clearlystates:“Anyunitorinpidualforanyreasoncannotviolatethewinner’will，orpersuade,inducement,coercionthewinnerstodonatewinnings.”Thewinnerhaspaidhistaxandmadeacontributiontosociety.Furthermore,donationsshouldbevoluntary,but“askeddonations”isforced.Andifthiskindofforcingcommitkeepgoingunregulated,itwillbeanawfulsocialpractice.曾有网友在投注点门口打出求助横幅，呼吁当地刚中了1200万元的大奖得主捐资救人。但实际上我国首部《彩票管理条例》中明确规定：“任何单位和个人不得违背中奖者本人意愿，以任何理由和方式劝导、引诱、强迫中奖者捐赠中奖奖金。